You will choose two military conflicts (large or small, declared or undeclared) (from the list attached below as a PDF and should be mentioned in the attached readings as well)  in which the United States has been engaged and answer a series of questions about that conflict. You will make an argument about whether it was a constitutionally legitimate use of force.

1. Make an argument (in one paragraph) about what enables a constitutionally, legally, politically legitimate use of force in the American Constitutional System. (You may consider moral or ethical arguments, but they must be answered in addition to the legal/political/constitutional question).

2. Choose TWO incidents in which the federal government of the United States has used force against foreign citizens or nations. Find one case that exemplifies the way you think the system should work, and one case that exemplifies the way you think the system should not work. (The PDF below should be used to find t

Find the purpose of the amendment, why the amendment was put into place, important court cases involving the Amendment, any limitations to the right or policy, a current event article that relates to the amendment, why the amendment is still relevant to todays society

c)      Human Security is a comprehensive concept that relates to several phenomena such as terrorism, genocide, ethnic conflict, poverty, or environmental change. Based on the experience of Africa, elaborate and justify your claims by exemplifications.(400 words)

d)      COVID19 is one of the most pressing challenges to security in the 21 st century. Elaborate on how the pandemics impact the security of various referent objects.(400 words)

e)      Energy security has become one of the major concerns for both developed and developing economies. How do you explain the growing emphasis on energy security at the beginning of the 21st century? What ramifications might lack energy security have on states power position in the international system? Is military power a relevant tool for states in their energy security endeavors? Apply examples to support your answers. 

This is an exam, you have to answer these 5 questions with 500 words or less.

Questions:
QUESTION ONE
Compare and contrast the approaches to Senate reform taken by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

QUESTION TWO
What are the arguments for and against party discipline?


QUESTION THREE
Why were sections 1 and 33 included in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

QUESTION FOUR
Under what conditions might it be acceptable for the Queen or the Governor General to refuse to take direction from the Prime Minister?

QUESTION SIX
How does the Charter of Rights and Freedoms enhance the power of the judiciary? 

Specific instructions will be in the attached file below! Please read and follow them carefully! Below I will attach one part of the work. It should be expanded to 2800-3000 thousand words. if it is convenient for you, you can change the subject of the essay, change the question, but the information that is in the file must be inserted. You can distribute it throughout the work. PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS and do not delay the deadline.

Please first read the following items before engaging in our second discussion:
Read: Kathryne Dunn Tenpas (2020), "Tracking turnover in the Trump administration," Brookings Institution: https://www.brookings.edu/research/tracking-turnover-in-the-trump-administration/
Read: James Pfiffner's chapter in the Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency on presidential transitions, pp. 85-104. (Please make sure you read this as it will be necessary for the presidential transition memo)
After you complete the reading, please answer the following question and post your answer in your assigned group on Slack:
What are some of the challenges that president-elects face in creating their administrations? As President-Elect Biden puts his team together, what types of personal and professional qualities, in your opinion, are necessary for the individuals that Biden and Harris hire for their administration? Lastly, name one thing that the Biden Administration should avoid doing as they pu

Prompt

In order for the Constitution of the United States of America to be ratified, a series of compromises were made, that sought to address the concerns raised by both the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. These concerns included issues of representation and population size, slavery, and institutional structure as well as the very nature of federalism. In 750-1000 words, discuss why the Constitution of the United States can be viewed as a series of compromises. Your paper must define federalism, discuss the positions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, as well as discuss the compromises made, which concerns they addressed, and how these compromises affect the institutional structure of the American government.

DIRECTIONS: Answer all three (3) of the questions below, typed, double-spaced, and submitted to me in Blackboard on or before Friday, Dec. 18 at 1:30 PM. You are to submit your exam through Blackboard. I would be pleased to receive your exam sooner if it is ready. Your exam will be graded based on its accuracy, specificity, use of pertinent specific information and examples from the readings and class, and general arguments. Late submissions will be penalized. Your total maximum exam length should not exceed 14 pages typed double-spaced (it may be shorter). Number your pages! NOTE: I do NOT expect to read two exams that are the same. If I do, they will be failing exams. You must write your own exam answers, and they must be written in your own words (direct quotes must have proper cites), not copy from books or other sources, which is PLAGIARISM, and will be treated as such by me.
1. It was a dark and stormy night. You sit alone, slumped at your desk, coaxing the last drops of what

Write an essay in which you demonstrate
your understanding of what was, perhaps, the most important extra-constitutional development in
American political history, viz., the creation of permanent political parties. Specifically,
Illuminate 1) the founders three arguments for a non-partisan political system, and
2) their reason for not banning political parties in spite of these arguments.
Discuss Martin Van Burens three-part defense of permanent, two-party competition.
Provide the late 19th
-century reformers (i.e., the Mugwumps) 1) critique of political
parties and 2) their proposed remedy for the problem you just identified.
Explain 1) how the Progressives critical view of political parties differed from that of the
late 19th
-century reformers, 2) the reform that the Progressives proposed, 3) the degree to
which the Progressives were successful in implementing that reform, and 4) when it was
that the Progressives proposed reform was fully r

) Using the three levels of analysis that we have employed this semester (viz., ends of society,
scope of government, and organization/distribution of power), provide a detailed treatment of the
Federalist-Republican Controversy with a view to explaining the following statement: One of
the grand ironies of American politics is that, while scholars of this field tend to focus their
attention on the thought of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the United States is in certain
important respects a Hamiltonian nation. (With regard to the matter of the proper scope of
government, recall that there are two policies that you must discuss.)