First, read the research article posted in Assignments as "Article For RRQ #1".



Then, answer the following questions in a .doc, .docx, or .rtf and upload it below. Your responses should be well-considered, complete, grammatical sentences, and should indicate that you genuinely read and thought critically about the article. Responses should be no fewer than 300 words total (not counting restating the questions, if you choose to do so).



Please answer each question in a separate, numbered paragraph.



Questions to answer:

What was, in your own words, the purpose of the paper?
What was/were the researcher's research question(s)? (in essence, the whole point of the paper--what were they hoping to find out?)
What methods did the researchers use to try to answer their research question(s)?
What did the authors conclude about their research question(s)? What greater implications might their findings have?
How does this study tie in

Overview

Many people study psychology because they want to understand themselves and others better. Tools have been developed to assess many aspects of personality. For this assessment, you will take an example of a personality test and write a reflection paper.

Context

Personality tests can be used for a variety of reasons including work placement, hiring, diagnosing and assessing, and simply identifying traits and characteristics. There are a variety of ways that we may administer, score, and interpret personality assessments, ranging from pencil and paper and one-on-one interviews to full computer testing. In order for a test to be useful, it needs to be both valid and reliable so that it consistently measures just what it suggests it measures. In this assessment, you may choose to complete a computer personality assessment. As you are completing the test, think about what you feel like and how that could impact the results. This is a fun and engaging way to hel

Read Daniel 1:1-21:
In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it. And the Lord delivered Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, along with some of the articles from the temple of God. These he carried off to the temple of his god in Babylonia[a] and put in the treasure house of his god.
Then the king ordered Ashpenaz, chief of his court officials, to bring into the kings service some of the Israelites from the royal family and the nobility young men without any physical defect, handsome, showing aptitude for every kind of learning, well informed, quick to understand, and qualified to serve in the kings palace. He was to teach them the language and literature of the Babylonians.  The king assigned them a daily amount of food and wine from the kings table. They were to be trained for three years, and after that they were to enter the kings service.
Among those who were chosen were some from Juda

I will upload the directions and the rubric.  I will also upload the commentary from the video to make sure you understand what the teacher does during the video and the instructional materials.  I have tried to upload the video and I can't at this time.  I will keep trying.  Make sure the assignment directions are followed and the rubric

Your post should be thorough yet concise ranging between 500-700 words (1-1.5 pages, single-spaced). You may also connect your response to previous lectures and readings, or build on other classmates posts to further enrich your argument. These low-stakes writing assignments are designed to facilitate reflection on your learning and deepen your conceptual understanding.

A summary in no more than three sentences of the main points of each assigned reading.
2-3 direct quotes from the readings that you found most compelling, thought-provoking, controversial, or perplexing. Explain why.
2-3 questions arising from the reading. These should be questions that emerged for you while reading or in connection to class discussion. Describe how you came to raise these questions and make direct references to the readings (direct quotes and/or page numbers).

Antecedents, Behavior, and Consequences
For this assignment, use the case study about James on page 263-276 in your Functional Assessment text. Create a blank Functional Analysis Observation Form (FAOF) using page 264-265 in your Functional Assessment text as a guide to document the behaviors of James.

The disruptive target behaviors for this analysis include James':

Hits and kicks adults when confronted for inappropriate behavior.
Noncompliant behavior.
Off-task behavior.
Disruptive Behavior.
Property Destruction.
You will also target his cooperative behavior.

Use the table you have created to record:

The antecedents (A) that trigger the behavior.
The consequences (C) that follow the behavior.
The setting events (SE) that may be affecting behavior.
Remember that there may not be setting events for each instance of behavior, but they may be present throughout the activity. Antecedents and consequences may also occur across paragrap

This is a Cultural Psychology class. Using at least two empirical sources, write a 4-page paper describing the cultural universals and cultural variability in the romantic relationships and marriage of the Chinese culture. The four pages do not include the cover page or reference page.  APA is required.

In everyday life, we are regularly exposed to various claims about human psychology and human behavior. While some of these claims may be scientifically valid, many of them are not. Choose a psychological claim about which you are skeptical. If you are having trouble thinking of one, think about common areas of pseudoscience that you may have heard about (e.g., astrology, ESP, hypnosis) to help you generate ideas. In your paper, develop a research question that you have about the claim. Discuss how the scientific method could be used to test your research question as compared to one of the other methods mentioned in the module (method of tenacity, method of authority, a priori method. My psychological claim is about people who believe the earth is flat.

Your paper should include the following
An introductory paragraph that provides an overview of the paper and how its goals will be achieved

A brief overview of the study

Hypothesis(es)

Methods (dont go into too much detail)

Results summarize the main findings (focus on interpreting the tables and graphs here, but do NOT copy and paste a table or graph into your paper without summarizing the results in your own words)
A discussion of the studys potential impact and importance of the findings

A critical analysis of
Methods what did they do wrong/right?
Interpretation did they over-interpret their findings?
What else needs to be done to address this research topic?
A brief mention of another study, from any journal, that has also attempted to address this topic tie your article together with this study (similarities, differences, which is better, etc.)

Your paper should be 3-4 double-spaced pages in length
MUST use proper

You will be required to write an 8-10 page, single-spaced, Literary Analytical Critique(not including bibliography). Your Literary Analytical Critique is required to be directly related to the course readings, the themes of the course ie. Multiculturalism, and your selected text. YourLiterary  Analytical  Critique must identify,  analyze,  and systematically integrate synthesis of a minimum of 4 additional outside sources into your critique. For each of your sources, you are to consider the particular type of source: primary, secondary or tertiary sources. Also, a blend of sources, with primary and secondary as the most valued sources, is important for supporting the development of a strong final paper.IMPORTANT: Your minimum of 4 outside academic sources MUST be in addition to the required assigned course readings but may be the same sources that you selected for prior assignments if they remain germane to the final assign