Please read attached texts and watch videos, and answer all questions.  Must be done in question answer format.
Answer must thoroughly addresses each question, including diverse perspectives when relevant (e.g., explaining arguments for and against a particular approach, or offering cautions when using a particular method)
You must integrate ideas from across all reading attached. Also you should  use specific quotes or examples from the assigned texts as evidence to support arguments. All claims and arguments are supported by specific quotes and examples from the texts.
References must be listed.

https://www.cuny-nysieb.org/translanguaging-resources/resources-for-work-with-particular-subgroups/supporting-emergent-bilinguals-with-individualized-education-plans-tips-from-cuny-nysieb/

http://www.rtinetwork.org/professional/videos/podcasts/janette-klingner-what-do-we-need-to-consider-when-implementing-response-to-intervention-with-english-language-learners

In this assignment you have to watch the video of my classmates project module that I have attached and then you are required to  take notes while watching the project (bulleted, complete sentences, whatever you prefer). The following are needed for the notes:
Concerns and questions you had about the format and content each group provided
Challenges that would be presented if this assessment were administered to a parent or child
Strengths and  limitations of each assessment instrument modified by your classmates

Please put the notes according to the project module.
Also please note that  I will  not be graded based on the content of notes but the quality of the notes

Students will need to create a treatment plan, based on a vignette, offering an empirically validated approach for helping a child who has recently been sexually abused. Vignette and template is provided. Template must be filled in with answers.  The six steps problem selection, problem definition, goal development, objective construction, intervention creation, and diagnosis determinationProblem selection/Presenting complaints: in narrative writing format, the student clearly and accurately identifies the most significant problem(s) to focus on in the treatment process.
Problem definition: the student clearly and accurately defines the problem(s), indicating how it is evidenced for the client and offering specific symptoms that are contributing to the problem.
Goal development: the student clearly and accurately identifies three (3) global, long-term goals that you believe will lead to a positive treatment outcome, with one descriptive statement per goal.
Objective cons

You are required to find information from the media on three events, and then write a paper at least 1800 words in length (at least 600 words for each of the three events) analyzing or explaining the events using at least two theories of personality. Understanding that there is almost never a single cause for a behavior, compare and contrast the effects that the assumptions of each perspective might have had on the event.

The major theories include dispositional (trait) perspective, psychodynamic, humanistic, biological, behaviorist, evolutionary, and social learning perspective.

Determines the plans background introduction. (150 to 200 words)

Develops a clear and specific research question that is relevant to the three research studies chosen. (25 words)

Develops a clear, specific, and testable hypothesis that corresponds to the research question. (25 words)

Describes aspects of sampling that would be considered while acquiring participants for the study.(100 words)

Selects a design (experimental or correlational) for the proposed study that aligns with the research question and hypothesis. (100 words)

Selects a measure to operationally define each of the conceptual variables.(100 Words)

Describes the type of analysis and the p value required to support the hypothesis. (50 Words)

Develops the plans discussion content. (250 to 350)

You will propose a theory-based intervention(s) and provide the logic of why the intervention(s) should work. How the intervention(s) will begin to solve the intractable problem. How the intervention(s) will improve learning opportunities and outcomes to address disparities that affect historically marginalized groups. A description of how systems of power should (re)shape policies and practices.
Extra Credit will be awarded to innovative approaches that combine technology, active engagement toward student development, in urban settings.
Refer to the rubric for more information about assignment details and expectations.
Due: December 9th Length: about 4 pages of narrative
1. One Page Overview slide ( the same slide you did before)
2. Case Study Background + Paper Road Map
3. Bronfenbrenner + Stakeholder Analysis (already completed just need to add the edits)
4. Specific Student Group + Theory Application + Implications/Conclusion + 10 Questions + Title Page and

Blended Learning - How does online learning impact college students' perceptions on learning chemistry and how does it affect their engagement in class?

Use 1.5 line spacing and a minimum 11 point font.

1.  Research Highlight/Press release. 500 words on one of the ten primary research articles
including one figure, addressed to an audience at the level of the readership of the RSC
magazine Chemistry World.

2.Reflective Commentary. 200 words describing your thought process behind the selection of
the ten papers.

3. Literature Review. 3000 words excluding the list of references and figure captions. The
literature review must describe the research from ten selected papers from the primary
literature including the seminar paper.

Blended Learning - How does online learning impact college students' perceptions on learning chemistry and how does it affect their engagement in class?

Use 1.5 line spacing and a minimum 11 point font.

1.  Research Highlight/Press release. 500 words on one of the ten primary research articles
including one figure, addressed to an audience at the level of the readership of the RSC
magazine Chemistry World.

2.Reflective Commentary. 200 words describing your thought process behind the selection of
the ten papers.

3. Literature Review. 3000 words excluding the list of references and figure captions. The
literature review must describe the research from ten selected papers from the primary
literature including the seminar paper.