I need this in an hour
1. The Apology and the Crito, taken together, reflect a principle that can be identified as the paradox of civic virtue. Explain and discuss what this means, being sure to present specific references to the two dialogues. After discussing the dialogues, present a contemporary news story that can be associated with the paradox of civic virtue. Please be specific.
2. In the Apology, Socrates presents to the jurors and everyone in the courtroom, his understanding as to why he finds himself in the situation that he is in. What is this situation? In your answer be sure to include discussion of the charges and what they refer to. Who is the Delphic Oracle and what is the role that she plays? What is the inscription over the entrance to her chamber and what does it mean? Be sure to explain, with example, the elenchus.
3.In the Crito, Socrates has a discussion with Crito. Who is Crito and why does he appear in Socrates jail cell? What are t
Write a short essay about either "The Garden Party." Remember to ensure that your introduction introduces your topic in a general way and develops that topic specifically until it arrives at your thesis statement, which states the argument of your paper. Your thesis should be the answer to an implied question, the solution to a problem, or the resolution to a paradox about a topic in the text. Also remember that you are not required to answer the specific questions in the assignment; think about them more like writing prompts or suggestions. Your thesis statement and your essay should be about the text in question, not about the general topic. If you want to write about a different topic, you may do so, but you must write about one of the texts we discussed in class.
There are many metaphors for class distinction in Katherine Mansfield's "The Garden Party." Why is the bread and butter that Laura eats in front of the work men significant? What does her mother's hat symbolize, and
I am picking the dreaming argument that was developed by Descartes, and I need to be able to explain it in my own words and convince my reader of the dreaming argument. It can be informal and not complex sentences. Practically I am informing someone who has never heard of this argument and convincing them. It cannot exceed 700 words, please and do not give any philosophical background or give any further info on Descartes.
This assignment consists of a short essay question, and a short response question. The main intent of these questions is to ensure that you have a sound grasp of the fundamentals of the material presented in this unit. To that end, there is a 3 to 4 page (1000 words) limit for the short essay question. Im not so concerned with whether you agree with a particular author or not. The quality of your answer is based on your exposition of the competing positions, your comparative analysis of those positions and, lastly, your argument in support of the position you defend.
As with all the assignments in this course, the short essay question is not designed to be a research question. There is no requirement to get material from external sources such as other authors, or reference websites, who have summarized, or criticized, the authors you are dealing with. In effect, including such material defeats your purpose in completing your essay because you are essentially telling me what some oth
What each journal entry should address:
a. Describe the philosophical problem (or problems) that are at the core of the unit (illustrate with examples)
b. Present at least two different compelling views on that problem, as well as what you think is the most compelling argument for each view.
c. Evaluate those arguments (are they valid? Are they sound? Are they persuasive?)
d. End each entry with a reflection on what you have learned (or not learned) and any unanswered questions for you.
What each journal entry should address:
a. Describe the philosophical problem (or problems) that are at the core of the unit (illustrate with examples)
b. Present at least two different compelling views on that problem, as well as what you think is the most compelling argument for each view.
c. Evaluate those arguments (are they valid? Are they sound? Are they persuasive?)
d. End each entry with a reflection on what you have learned (or not learned) and any unanswered questions for you.
What each journal entry should address:
a. Describe the philosophical problem (or problems) that are at the core of the unit (illustrate with examples)
b. Present at least two different compelling views on that problem, as well as what you think is the most compelling argument for each view.
c. Evaluate those arguments (are they valid? Are they sound? Are they persuasive?)
d. End each entry with a reflection on what you have learned (or not learned) and any unanswered questions for you.
Instructions & ethical principles are attached, based on this reading:
SCENARIO 61: The Olympic Games Operation and the Stuxnet Worm
In June 2012, the New York Times reported that the United States and Israeli governments had been cooperating on an initiative codenamed Olympic Games. Originally conceived and developed during the George W. Bush administration, the Olympic Games operation aimed at disrupting Irans uranium enrichment program and thus damaging that nations nuclear capability. At the core of this joint operation was a computer worm known as Stuxnet, a cyberweapon that targeted electronic program controllers developed by Siemens Corporation (in Germany) for industrial controlled computers (ICCs) that were installed in Iran. The Stuxnet worm was allegedly responsible for (i) sending misleading data to computer monitors in Iran and (ii) causing several of that nations centrifugesthat is, fastspinning machines that enrich uraniumto spin out of control. The Stuxne
This assignment consists of a short essay question, and a short response question. The main intent of these questions is to ensure that you have a sound grasp of the fundamentals of the material presented in this unit. To that end, there is a 3 to 4 page (1000 words) limit for the short essay question. Im not so concerned with whether you agree with a particular author or not. The quality of your answer is based on your exposition of the competing positions, your comparative analysis of those positions and, lastly, your argument in support of the position you defend.
As with all the assignments in this course, the short essay question is not designed to be a research question. There is no requirement to get material from external sources such as other authors, or reference websites, who have summarized, or criticized, the authors you are dealing with. In effect, including such material defeats your purpose in completing your essay because you are essentially telling me what some oth
Ethical Perspectives
Submit as a single Word document:
Part I
Define the following ethical perspectives in your own words. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and a reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite sources to provide credit for the ideas and concepts.
A = Rule utilitarianism
B = Kantian ethics
C = Virtue ethics
D = Care ethics
E = Social contract ethics
F = Subjective relativism
G = Cultural relativism
H = Divine command theory
I = Act utilitarianism
Part II
Determine which ethical perspective above is primarily reflected in each of the ten arguments below and explain why. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and in the reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite source
