Business Management: The aim of this literature review is to Critically review the recent theoretical and empirical literature on the impact of employee engagement in contemporary employment relations Custom Essay

The aim of this literature review is to Critically review the recent theoretical and empirical literature on the

impact of employee engagement in contemporary employment relations. The literature review must look at a specific

area of Employee engagement, for which I have chosen "The shift in perceptive towards engagement that is

needed in order to maximise engagement", the review should look at all the major theories regarding this

specific section of Employee engagement and try to compare and contrast some of the different ideas in

literature.

The literature review should be structure with an introduction, main body and conclusion and should only be a

critical review of academic literature and not involve personal ideas or thoughts on the topic.

furthermore, the conclusion of this review should outline some of the research gaps, evaluate the supportive and

contradictory arguments made throughout the review, discuss the limitations and future of engagement in regards

to the topic and summarize the literature review.

Below is the assignment brief given to me, which I hope will help describe the instructions –

Overview
The purpose of this assignment is to read academic articles that pertain to the material in this unit. This paper

is individually assessed. Students are expected to demonstrate knowledge of the main themes in the literature on

their selected topic. This includes a formative component, journal reading summary and a summative component.
Intended Learning Outcomes Assessed – ILOs – 1-4
Understand key conceptual frameworks, guiding principles, contemporary developments and current debates/issues

in terms of modern employment relations practice, its resource management and public policy implications;
Understand how and why contemporary employment relations is structured and HR managed, related strategies

devised and implemented, interests ‘voiced’, co-operation sought and conflicts/ tensions caused and resolved;
Display appropriate knowledge and offer analytical insights on employment-related matters and HRM-linked issues

and critically evaluate the potential impact of public policy changes as they arise;
Demonstrate an awareness of the types of skill, knowledge and perspective that HR practitioners require in

order to handle competently and confidently employment relations and HRM-linked matters arising in the field

The Task:
Critically review the recent theoretical and empirical literature on:
The impact of employee engagement in contemporary employment relations.

Each student is required to conduct a 2500 words literature review on the approved contemporary employment

relations issue/topic. The first step in the literature review will be to formulate a problem (unresolved issue)

that will be the focus of the review. Alternatively, you can focus on key controversies in the broad topic. In

conducting the literature review students are required to use only the articles published in the journals

specified below or articles drawn from course syllabus.

No less than 50% of your readings MUST come from these listed journals:
• Academy of Management Review
• Academy of Management Journal
• Administrative Science Quarterly
• Journal of Management
• Journal of Management Studies
• Harvard Business Review
• British Journal of Management
• California Management Review
• International Journal of Management Reviews
• Employee Relations -The International Journal
• Academy of Management Perspectives
• Journal of Management Inquiry
• Personnel Psychology
• Journal of Applied Psychology
• Journal of Organizational Behavior
• Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
• Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
• Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory
• Public Administration Review
• Human Resource Management (USA)
• Human Resource Management Journal
• Human Resource Development International
• Human Resource Development Review
• Human Resource Management Review
• Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society
• British Journal of Industrial Relations
• Work, Employment and Society
• International Journal of Human Resource Management
• Human Relations
• Organization Science
• Organization Studies
• Management Science

The literature review should cover and address the points outlined below and must be 1.5 spaced (12 point font).

The structure suggested below is a possible guide to use but you are NOT restricted to this guideline.

Introduction to the Review
 Is the area of focus/ general topic well explained?
 Have you identified the overall trends in what has already been published?
 Is the purpose of the review made evident to the reader?
 If you are introducing new terminology or concepts as part of the review, are these defined or clarified?
 Is the organization of the review made evident to the reader?

Main body – Presentation of Studies Being Reviewed
 Does the presentation of the studies within sections include a storyline, that is, is the connection between

each piece of literature made explicit for the reader?
 When an item of literature is introduced, is it summarized for the reader in terms of what the authors did,

when they did it, how they reached their conclusions, etc.?
 Have you been critical about each piece of literature?
 Do you provide summary sentences at the end of sections to help the reader understand what the main issues are?

Main body – Evidence of Analysis, Synthesis, Critique Taking Place within the Review
 Have you gone beyond merely summarizing the studies? Is there evidence of analysis and critique of individual

studies?
 Is there evidence of analysis and synthesis across the studies? Do you compare and evaluate each item of the

literature? Are the messages that emerge from the literature made evident? (This may involve comparing results,

identifying differences among a number of studies).
 Are the gaps, problems, central issues, debate, or issues unresolved by the literature clearly identified?
 Do you provide evidence to support the arguments, analysis, and criticism being made? Is the evidence

sufficient and convincing?
 Does your voice come out as separate and distinct from that of the authors you are summarizing, critiquing, and

reviewing?

Conclusion to the Review
 Does your conclusion summarise the literature maintaining the focus presented in the introduction?
 Have you overall evaluated the current “state of the art” pointing out gaps in the literature and

inconsistencies?
 Have you been able to identify the contribution made by your review efforts?
 Have you made suggestions for research that needs to be conducted in the future?

Organization and Writing Qualities of the Review
 Have you used appropriate headings to group the literature according to themes? Specifically, have you grouped

research studies and other relevant literature appropriately according to common themes?
 If there are sections within the review are these logically ordered and clearly explained to the reader?
 Have you provided clearly articulated transitions between sections? (Is the storyline easy to follow?)
 Is each item in the literature review cited appropriately?
 How are quotes used? (If included, they should only be used when you cannot paraphrase the message easily.)
I hope this information gives you a good description of the literature review.

 

You can place an order similar to this with us. You are assured of an authentic custom paper delivered within the given deadline besides our 24/7 customer support all through.

 

[order_calculator]